Marco Ruggiero is board-certified medical doctor and clinical radiologist with a PhD in molecular biology, currently full professor of molecular biology and genetics at the University of Firenze, Italy where he teaches in the Faculties of Medicine, Sciences (chemistry, biology and biotechnology) and Engineering. By coincidence he shared an office with Dr. Peter Duesberg in the 1980s which is where he first encountered his heretical ideas about cancer viruses, HIV, AIDS and AZT. He discusses his background and HIV/AIDS science with David and Terry for an hour.
Professor Ruggiero has many scientific publications indexed on PubMed (including his famous Medical Hypotheses paper which was withdrawn by order of the publisher, overruling the editor). He is the most recent appointee to the board of Rethinking AIDS . Visit his website for more information.
If you like to have something to look at while you listen to the podcast try:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHT6nBb2BSA
VIVA LA ITALIA!
Here Daniele Mandrioli presents his thesis at the Medical School in Bologna, Italy, based on irrefutable FACTS that HIV does NOT cause AIDS and graduates with his doctorate in medicine!
“DOES HIV CAUSE AIDS?” -“HIV CAUSA L’ AIDS?”- Daniele Mandrioli – 1/2 ITA-ENGsub
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YUoU4EQYAY Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjvqYRZoBzI Part 2
~South Africa~
And Daniele Mandrioli is now working in Peter Duesberg’s lab in Berkeley. As the wheel turns.
And VIVA LA AUSTRALIA!
Thanks to the The Perth Group, the Amyl Nitrite Awareness League, and other brave community groups and leaders, prepared to present issues, and openly discuss issues in mutually beneficial, two-way open conversations.
And one thought pigs couldn’t fly? They can with enough spin.
What’s the alternative? “Oh, if you see something suspicious and dangerous, like the poisoing of a whole section of the community, then it is in the nations best interest, no … the globes best interest, to report it to the terrorist hotline, or national crime commission. Unless, of course, if it’s faggots regularly sniffing large amounts of toxic, immuno-suppressive, inhalants”?
Doesn’t seem to make much sense to me, but I guess it makes a lot of cents, dollars and euros.
The Australian Financial Review reported that “40% of the gay community used toxic inhalants as a regular sex drug”. Do we really want this figure to rise to, say 70%, or even more? Do we then start marketing it in the mainstream press and get other groups hooked, which we can then blame on some “nastly little virus” (Bono, World AIDS Day, Sydney 2010).
This would make a great feature on Star Trek. I can image Picard saying: “We outlawed the poisoning of faggots on all planets in the Federation ages ago. We’re not going to put up with it here”. Then Data says: “No, we will not take this lying down”.
Oh please, no-one cares if faggots poison themselves every time they have sex, otherwise someone would have done something about it long ago.
Let the figure get to 70%, or even 100%. We just keep arresting them for “spreading a dangerous virus”. Little do they know, they are actually stronger with the virus, than without it. Just as long as they keep sniffing poisons, isn’t that right?
Information is power.
While we are on the subject of YouTube, when it comes to the now fallen Lowy, I suspect it is more a matter of the type of businesses he has been running, rather than the tax not being paid? What business activities have we all been paying for? And how long has this been going on? Who has been paying the price for all this secrecy, greed, dogma and deception?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noU5dRoPIX4
The real reason for this Gross Financial Cock-tale! The truth will come out in the end. Sometimes it happens long after our lifetime. In the meantime we live with ignorant bliss, hope, learning the best lessons from our greatest mistakes, with us evolving in an ever changing journey.
Money will not make this constantly troubled-little world go around. Neither will spin. Neither will drugs.
Can you believe there is a web site which gloats about AIDS skeptics or dissidents that have, supposedly, died of AIDS. And the creater has done it for his amusement, to bully a group of compassionate humanists that only want to raise awareness about a better future, in a spirit of openness and with solutions in mind.
So what is the gay community’s solution to the alkyl nitrite poisonings of the last 30 years? Only time will tell.
I was told that, with respect to toxic poppers, the troubled authorities were “planning to tackle Supply and Education”. Um, yes, but when are you planning to start this, is the next big question!
great job David, as usual, thank you! 🙂
anyway, I would have asked Ruggiero, as to other dissidents who claim that hiv exists: why.. why if the virus really exists nobody has ever achived to purify it? Don’t they think it be useful and necessary to purify it once and for all? Don’t they think it should be Vital/unavoidable for the research? And Beside useful, shouldn’t it even be an easy task to perform? How do they respond to these questions?
As far as I can understand being an engineer, so a lay person, without purification, you cannot possibly validate the hiv tests.. and without a validation how can one possibly establish the false positive rates? or rely on the epidemiological data? (Doesn’t a part of the Duesberg’s critique of the hiv dogmas rely on those data? doesn’t this bother him?)
And How do Duesberg et others justify the presence of different criteria for a positive Western Blot?
Ruggiero says PCR test are far more accurate, nontheless nor this test has ever been validated, has it? then Who can assure him those strains really belong to a unique entity?
And how does he justify/explain the incredible number of different rna strains that are being discovered every day? Is that credible on a biological basis?
At 22:12 you asked Ruggiero if he was aware there are viremias found in antibody negative people. Well, As far as I can remember, in articles like “Viral Load and the PCR”, “Viral load of crap”, “False positive Viral Load”, “Problems with hiv science” published on the VirusMyth site, there are many references to papers which showed high viral loads in negative people, with percentages ranging from 5% up to 15% of the subjects… If I recall it corectly, at first, the FDA wanted to use the new PCR technology as a diagnostic test, a more powerful one, since they thought it could have eluded the “window period” which affects the antibody tests. Nonetheless, when they realized there was such a bad correspondence between the two, they decided the antibody tests were more reliable and so the FDA never approved the PCR as diagnostic tests, but solely as an aid for evaluate the ARV therapies, which is well advised in the disclaimers! In other words they DECIDED the PCR showed too many “false positives” and so decided to use it ONLY on persons whose serological status had already been established.
So, if I recall it correctly, the FDA doesnt agree with Ruggiero in claiming that the PCR is far more better than the antibody tests!
David, I need your help, I need to sort things out here… so What do you think about all this stuff? I’d really appreciate your thoughts and opinions..
thanks
Benedetto
NB – I do apologize for my English 🙁 sorry
Il tuo inglese è bene Benedetto!
I agree with you, without purification you cannot know what the HIV genome is, so you can’t do PCR. In the interviews we try to get our guests to tell their stories and avoid head-to-head debates. Through the questions we try to get at some of the issues and let our readers make up their minds.
ah ha also your Italian è bene David!
Yes, it is a good policy, I agree, no one would love to engage useless arguments… even because I know this is an old fashion argument among dissidents.. unfortunately 🙁
thanks again