So you’ve figured out that your “HIV” diagnosis doesn’t make any sense. Is it time to sue someone yet? Whom? And how? “How Positive Are You” co-host Elizabeth Ely speaks with Washington, D.C., attorney Jonathan Dailey about some pending lawsuits, including:
- Bobby Russell, a Kentucky man who discovered he had been misdiagnosed and treated for “HIV” for eight years.
- A case against a public health clinic in Washington, D.C., currently being considered for class-action status to assert the need for meaningful care for other diseases — not treating just “AIDS.” (A previous case against this clinic, which settled in August 2012, is reported here.)
Can you sue to get your “HIV-positive” designation reversed? How? Has anyone yet succeeded at this yet? And why aren’t attorneys across the U.S. more eager to assist clients who question these diagnoses and want their doctors and clinics to produce the evidence — “put up or shut up”? What’s being done to address the obstacles and, as Mr. Dailey says, make the matter of suing in a court of law less like “pushing a rock up a hill”?
Listen to this Podcast to hear the answers to these questions and more. Along the way, you’ll learn of resources such as the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice‘s “Operation Letterhead” and “Scarlet Letter” pages, the large-scale diagnoses-for-dollars scam behind herding whole populations into clinics for “HIV testing,” and this funny-but-sad commentary on the CDC’s own legal “disclaimers” around “HIV” and “AIDS.”
Or just forget it. Should you be more inclined toward denial and wish to take a more positive, upbeat view of things, you might save the money you might have used to hire a boring old lawyer. Instead, you can hang out with Dab the AIDS Bear on an “HIV Cruise” to celebrate your “fabulous disease.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
[…] Hollywood movie to go anti-AZT, but it’s one long legal disclaimer. If you’re looking for someone to sue, you won’t find them here. This is Hollywood’s attempt to rewrite history while taking no […]
[…] HIV/AIDS Dissidents also ran with the story including podcasts on How Positive Are You (HPAY) with Elizabeth Ely and Russell’s attorney (who is no longer on […]
[…] plan to put Bobby, and possibly his lawyer, on HPAY again in the next few days. The case was previously featured in Episode […]
I would like to draw attention to the comment/link above by “HIV Innocence Group Truth.” This is a catty and mean-spirited attempt to discourage patients facing a serious medical misdiagnosis from seeking help, and these people show their true colors here.
The Russell lawsuit is currently dismissed not because it has no merit but rather on Statute of Limitations grounds — allegedly not filing suit within one year of learning he was wronged. Bobby Russell is currently struggling to find a way to appeal this dismissal. If the “Truth” group cared at all about the rights of HIV positives, it would also be promoting, not mocking, his quest for justice. OMSJ has not, to my knowledge, ever refused to take this on; it has been ready to provide expert witnesses when there was an existing lawsuit, and it would probably continue in that role if the case is reinstated. Please give to Bobby’s online funding campaign, to bring this case back to life.
OMSJ, a licensed California private investigative agency, is currently alleging in federal court that this “Truth” group infringes its trademarks, particularly the domain name of OMSJ’s “HIV Innocence Group,” and that the “Truth” group is a front for various interests trying to protect HIV testing, treatment and research from outside scrutiny.
OMSJ’s HIV Innocence Group has cooperated with defense attorneys to free more than 50 people charged with criminal “HIV transmission” cases. This “Truth” group objects to that as well, while claiming to represent the interests of HIV positives. Indeed, it is hard to find any kindness, integrity or concern for others in any of the “Truth” group’s articles. It is, quite simply, a voice for a corrupt and unaccountable AIDS establishment.
To those who ask these questions and sue if necessary, I salute you for your courage. You do not deserve this kind of taunting, directed at you as much as at Clark Baker and the attorneys who give their time and effort to bring justice to persons wronged by “the test.” Yours, Beth
[…] an attack on our comments page against Bobby Russell’s lawsuit (which we discussed in Episodes 71 and 76 and posted as an “XTRA” link to “The Infectious Myth” Episode 29) […]
[…] HPAY first interviewed Bobby Russell in its Episode 76. Co-host David Crowe talked with him on “The Infectious Myth,” posted HERE as an XTRA. Beth interviewed his Washington, D.C., lawyer, Jonathan Dailey, in Episode 71. […]
[…] featured Kentucky malpractice litigant Bobby Russell (see also HERE) and Washington, D.C., attorney Jonathan Dailey, as mentioned in this Podcast. For background on how much you can trust your “HIV test,” see […]